Tuesday, April 3, 2007

Who gets it?

Although this was a very lengthy article, it definitly had some good points and insights which we as future educators should consider. I personally felt that each participant "got it" but these are the two I agreed with most:

  • Carole Buasell:

Could she be on target anymore? Every principal should be having professional staff development meetings where teachers will learn all sources of technology and how best to use them in their classrooms. Just recently my mother learned how to pod cast, directed by a professional at her staff development meeting. There is no reason why this cannot happen in every school. How else are teachers going to learn? Of course computers can be a distraction if they are not used properly and according to the lesson plan. So many students smile and relax when they walk into a classroom and see computers because they think it is play time. Although they should enjoy working on computers, educational reasons for them need to be enforced.

  • Andrew Trotter:

The main reason why teachers get annoyed when they see students "playing" with their cell phones is because they automatically assume that they are texting out of bordem. Although this may be true and students have taken advantage of their cell phones during class, teachers need to be aware of the benefits of cell phones. Today, students can surf the internet, google, etc on their cell phones. However, the power is now in the hands of the students to use this tool "appropriatly." It is also important that teachers emphasize that no slang will be used in their classrooms. A few weeks ago I posted that I cannot stand when people use slang or shorthand when texting or iming. It's not a good habit!!

2 comments:

Theresa [♥] Marie said...

Kristen-

I think that you did a great job in getting different viewpoints on the whole idea of "who gets its". When Andrew Trotter said, "It is also important that teachers emphasize that no slang will be used in their classrooms. A few weeks ago I posted that I cannot stand when people use slang or shorthand when texting or iming. It's not a good habit!!" I think that is completely bogus. According to Warlick, it is a good thing to embrace the instant messanger language. It is like a new world to the students and it is something they are interested in. If teachers want to get more on the students level and have them interested in class than we as educators are going to have to make some changes. I am not saying proper english should dissappear but we should be able to adapt in whatever situation we encounter. What do you think??

Anonymous said...

Hi Kris, I'm browsing for your new content.

How exciting to hear your mom is podcasting.

I wonder if our continuing to see students' interest in computers as "play" rather than the "work" that will assure their successfully negotiating 21st century flat world demands is problematic.

I know you have expressed concern about IM language. I wonder if you're beginning to challenge your own assumptions about language's elasticity--its ability to absorb every generation's changes/challenges to it and still retain its elegance and functionality.